Project Rubric for Media Product
CRITERIA
|
Score 10
(Below Performance Standards)
|
Score 20
(Meets Criteria)
|
Score 30
(Demonstrates Exceptional Performance)
|
Criteria #1
Audio
& Video Elements
Score:_______
|
·
No music or illegal music
·
Inappropriate music or images
·
Music too loud for voice track
·
Poor quality images, hard to see
·
Low contrast or hard to read text
|
·
Legal music or written permission
from copyright
·
Relevant music and images
·
Audio levels balanced so voice
tracks can be heard
·
High quality images, easy to see
·
High contrast and clearly readable
text
|
In addition to
meeting the PROFICIENT criteria
·
Music adds deeper layer of meaning
or
·
Music choices match rhythm, style,
mood and pace of video throughout
·
Visual rhythm balanced in distance
and orientation of shots and movement direction
|
|
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - - - -
- - - - 10
|
11
- - - - - - - - - - - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20
|
21
- - - - - - - - - - - - 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 30
|
|
Criteria #2
Voiceover
Score:_______
|
·
Poor volume
·
Poor spacing / speed
·
Poor annunciation: hard to
understand
|
·
Good volume
·
Good pacing / speed
·
Good annunciation: easy to
understand
|
In addition to
meeting the PROFICIENT criteria
·
Dramatic Expression in voice
·
Tone adds to character(s) and events
|
|
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - - - -
- - - - 10
|
11
- - - - - - - - - - - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20
|
21
- - - - - - - - - - - - 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 30
|
|
Criteria #3
Script
/ Staging
Score:_______
|
·
Unoriginal, boring, unorganized
·
No Introduction or conclusion
·
Actors appear to just be making
things up on the spot or images appear to be just copy-pasted randomly from
internet
|
·
Well written script, easy to follow
·
Interesting introduction and
conclusion
·
Original idea and pertinent
information relating to issue
|
In addition to
meeting the PROFICIENT criteria
·
High level of audience engagement
·
Gave audience something to do or
think differently after
·
Gave audience “life lessons”
|
|
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - - - -
- - - - 10
|
11
- - - - - - - - - - - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20
|
21
- - - - - - - - - - - - 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 30
|
|
Criteria #4
Timing
Score:_______
|
·
Total time too long or too short
·
Individual video portions too long,
short, fast, or slow
·
Repeated images for no dramatic
purpose
·
Confusing or awkward scene changes
or random transitions and effects for no purpose
|
·
Appropriate total run time
·
Audio fits video
·
Video elements well-timed (Text is
displayed long enough to be read, images are displayed just long enough to
convey their point)
·
Transitions fit the meaning or
structure
|
In addition to
meeting the PROFICIENT criteria
·
Video edits match audio/music
·
In fast-paced segments, video edits
all land on downbeats in the music
|
|
0 - - - - - - - -
- - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - 10
|
11 - - - - - - -
- - - - - 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - 20
|
21 - - - - - - -
- - - - - 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - 30
|
|
Criteria #5
Work
Habits / Effort
Score:_______
|
·
Poor work habits/ off task
·
Little to no effort / wastes time in
class
|
·
Good work habits
·
Good effort / use of class time
|
In addition to
meeting the PROFICIENT criteria
·
Excellent work habits/ use of class
time
·
Excellent effort
|
|
0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - - - -
- - - - 10
|
11 - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 - - - - - - -
- - - - - 20
|
21 - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 - - - - - - -
- - - - - 30
|
Total Score:_______
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.